4.7 Article

Fear from the Heart: Sensitivity to Fear Stimuli Depends on Individual Heartbeats

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 19, Pages 6573-6582

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3507-13.2014

Keywords

amygdala; anxiety; attention; baroreceptor; emotion; fMRI

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council [CCFIB AG 234150]
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. European Union [258749]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Leadership [EP/G007543/1]
  5. Dr. Mortimer and Theresa Sackler Foundation
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G007543/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/G007543/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognitions and emotions can be influenced by bodily physiology. Here, we investigated whether the processing of brief fear stimuli is selectively gated by their timing in relation to individual heartbeats. Emotional and neutral faces were presented to human volunteers at cardiac systole, when ejection of blood from the heart causes arterial baroreceptors to signal centrally the strength and timing of each heartbeat, and at diastole, the period between heartbeats when baroreceptors are quiescent. Participants performed behavioral and neuroimaging tasks to determine whether these interoceptive signals influence the detection of emotional stimuli at the threshold of conscious awareness and alter judgments of emotionality of fearful and neutral faces. Our results show that fearful faces were detected more easily and were rated as more intense at systole than at diastole. Correspondingly, amygdala responses were greater to fearful faces presented at systole relative to diastole. These novel findings highlight a major channel by which short-term interoceptive fluctuations enhance perceptual and evaluative processes specifically related to the processing of fear and threat and counter the view that baroreceptor afferent signaling is always inhibitory to sensory perception.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available