4.7 Article

The Anterior Cingulate Gyrus Signals the Net Value of Others' Rewards

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 18, Pages 6190-6200

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2701-13.2014

Keywords

cingulate; effort; empathy; reward; social; value

Categories

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council (1 + 3 studentship)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evaluating the costs and benefits of our own choices is central to most forms of decision-making and its mechanisms in the brain are becoming increasingly well understood. To interact successfully in social environments, it is also essential to monitor the rewards that others receive. Previous studies innonhumanprimates have found neurons in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) that signal the net value (benefit minus cost) of rewards that will be received oneself and also neurons that signal when a reward will be received by someone else. However, little is understood about the way in which the human brain engages in cost-benefit analyses during social interactions. Does theACCsignal the net value (the benefits minus the costs) of rewards that others will receive? Here, using fMRI, we examined activity time locked to cues that signaled the anticipated reward magnitude (benefit) to be gained and the level of effort (cost) to be incurred either by a subject themselves or by a social confederate. We investigated whether activity in the ACC covaries with the net value of rewards that someone else will receive when that person is required to exert effort for the reward. We show that, although activation in the sulcus of the ACC signaled the costs on all trials, gyral ACC (ACCg) activity varied parametrically only with the net value of rewards gained by others. These results suggest that the ACCg plays an important role in signaling cost-benefit information by signaling the value of others' rewards during social interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available