4.7 Article

Aberrant Functional Connectivity in Dissociable Hippocampal Networks Is Associated with Deficits in Memory

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 14, Pages 4920-4928

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4281-13.2014

Keywords

fMRI; memory; plasticity; reorganization; temporal lobe epilepsy

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  3. British Medical Association
  4. MRC [MR/J009024/1, G0900806] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/J009024/1, G0900806] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the healthy human brain, evidence for dissociable memory networks along the anterior-posterior axis of the hippocampus suggests that this structure may not function as a unitary entity. Failure to consider these functional divisions may explain diverging results among studies of memory adaptation in disease. Using task-based and resting functional MRI, we show that chronic seizures disrupting the anterior medial temporal lobe (MTL) preserve anterior and posterior hippocampal-cortical dissociations, but alter signaling between these and other key brain regions. During performance of a memory encoding task, we found reduced neural activity in human patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy relative to age-matched healthy controls, but no upregulation of fMRI signal in unaffected hippocampal subregions. Instead, patients showed aberrant resting fMRI connectivity within anterior and posterior hippocampal-cortical networks, which was associated with memory decline, distinguishing memory-intact from memory-impaired patients. Our results highlight a critical role for intact hippocampo-cortical functional communication in memory and provide evidence that chronic injury-induced functional reorganization in the diseased MTL is behavioral inefficient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available