4.7 Article

Alterations in Endogenous Opioid Functional Measures in Chronic Back Pain

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 33, Issue 37, Pages 14729-14737

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1400-13.2013

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01 DA 022520, R01 027494]
  2. Phil F. Jenkins Foundation
  3. Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland, Helsinki, Finland
  4. National Institutes of Health [NIH 5T32EY017878, NIH 5T32DA007281]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The absence of consistent end organ abnormalities in many chronic pain syndromes has led to a search for maladaptive CNS mechanisms that may explain their clinical presentations and course. Here, we addressed the role of brain regional mu-opioid receptor-mediated neurotransmission, one of the best recognized mechanisms of pain regulation, in chronic back pain in human subjects. We compared mu-opioid receptor availability in vivo at baseline, during pain expectation, and with moderate levels of sustained pain in 16 patients with chronic nonspecific back pain (CNBP) and in 16 age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects, using the mu-opioid receptor-selective radioligand [C-11]carfentanil and positron emission tomography. We found that CNBP patients showed baseline increases in thalamic mu-opioid receptor availability, contrary to a previously studied sample of patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia. During both pain expectation and sustained pain challenges, CNBP patients showed regional reductions in the capacity to activate this neurotransmitter system compared with their control sample, further associated with clinical pain and affective state ratings. Our results demonstrate heterogeneity in endogenous opioid system functional measures across pain conditions, and alterations in both receptor availability and endogenous opioid function in CNBP that are relevant to the clinical presentation of these patients and the effects of opioid analgesics on mu-opioid receptors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available