4.7 Article

Role of Inhibition in Respiratory Pattern Generation

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 33, Issue 13, Pages 5454-5465

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1595-12.2013

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL 70029, HL 72211]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Postsynaptic inhibition is a key element of neural circuits underlying behavior, with 20-50% of all mammalian (nongranule) neurons considered inhibitory. For rhythmic movements in mammals, e. g., walking, swimming, suckling, chewing, and breathing, inhibition is often hypothesized to play an essential rhythmogenic role. Here we study the role of fast synaptic inhibitory neurotransmission in the generation of breathing pattern by blocking GABA(A) and glycine receptors in the preBotzinger complex (preBotC), a site essential for generation of normal breathing pattern, and in the neighboring Botzinger complex (BotC). The breathing rhythm continued following this blockade, but the lung inflation-induced Breuer-Hering inspiratory inhibitory reflex was suppressed. The antagonists were efficacious, as this blockade abolished the profound effects of the exogenously applied GABAA receptor agonist muscimol or glycine, either of which under control conditions stopped breathing in vagus-intact or vagotomized, anesthetized, spontaneously breathing adult rats. In vagotomized rats, GABA(A)ergic and glycinergic antagonists had little, if any, effect on rhythm. The effect in vagus-intact rats was to slow the rhythm to a pace equivalent to that seen after suppression of the aforementioned Breuer-Hering inflation reflex. We conclude that postsynaptic inhibition within the preBotC and BotC is not essential for generation of normal respiratory rhythm in intact mammals. We suggest the primary role of inhibition is in shaping the pattern of respiratory motor output, assuring its stability, and in mediating reflex or volitional apnea, but not in the generation of rhythm per se.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available