4.7 Article

Measuring the Firing Rate of High-Resistance Neurons with Cell-Attached Recording

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages 3118-3130

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5371-11.2012

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Allocation Specifique de Recherche
  2. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  3. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [08-231083]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell-attached recording is extensively used to study the firing rate of mammalian neurons, but potential limitations of the method have not been investigated in detail. Here we perform cell-attached recording of molecular layer interneurons in cerebellar slices from rats and mice, and we study how experimental conditions influence the measured firing rate. We find that this rate depends on time in cell-attached mode, on pipette potential, and on pipette ionic composition. In the first minute after sealing, action currents are variable in shape and size, presumably reflecting membrane instability. The firing rate remains approximately constant during the first 4 min after sealing and gradually increases afterward. Making the pipette potential more positive leads to an increase in the firing rate, with a steeper dependence on voltage if the pipette solution contains K+ as the main cation than if it contains Na+. Ca2+ imaging experiments show that establishing a cell-attached recording can result in an increased somatic Ca2+ concentration, reflecting an increased firing rate linked to an increase in the pipette-cell conductance. Pipette effects on cell firing are traced to a combination of passive electrical coupling, opening of voltage- and Ca2+-sensitive K+ channels (BK channels) after action potentials, and random activation of voltage-insensitive, presumably mechanosensitive, cationic channels. We conclude that, unless experimental conditions are optimized, cellattached recordings in small neurons may report erroneous firing rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available