4.7 Article

Balanced Increases in Selectivity and Tolerance Produce Constant Sparseness along the Ventral Visual Stream

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 32, Issue 30, Pages 10170-10182

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6125-11.2012

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute [1F32EY018063, R01EY014970]
  2. McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although popular accounts suggest that neurons along the ventral visual processing stream become increasingly selective for particular objects, this appears at odds with the fact that inferior temporal cortical (IT) neurons are broadly tuned. To explore this apparent contradiction, we compared processing in two ventral stream stages (visual cortical areas V4 and IT) in the rhesus macaque monkey. We confirmed that IT neurons are indeed more selective for conjunctions of visual features than V4 neurons and that this increase in feature conjunction selectivity is accompanied by an increase in tolerance (invariance) to identity-preserving transformations (e.g., shifting, scaling) of those features. We report here that V4 and IT neurons are, on average, tightly matched in their tuning breadth for natural images (sparseness) and that the average V4 or IT neuron will produce a robust firing rate response (>50% of its peak observed firing rate) to similar to 10% of all natural images. We also observed that sparseness was positively correlated with conjunction selectivity and negatively correlated with tolerance within both V4 and IT, consistent with selectivity-building and invariance-building computations that offset one another to produce sparseness. Our results imply that the conjunction-selectivity-building and invariance-building computations necessary to support object recognition are implemented in a balanced manner to maintain sparseness at each stage of processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available