4.7 Article

A Proactive Mechanism for Selective Suppression of Response Tendencies

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 16, Pages 5965-5969

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6292-10.2011

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA026452]
  3. National Science Foundation [0921168]
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  5. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0921168] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While most research on stopping action examines how an initiated response is stopped when a signal occurs (i.e., reactively), everyday life also calls for a mechanism to prepare to stop a particular response tendency (i.e., proactively and selectively). We hypothesized that human subjects can prepare to stop a particular response by proactively suppressing that response representation in the brain. We tested this by using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and concurrent electromyography. This allowed us to interrogate the corticomotor excitability of specific response representations even before action ensued. We found that the motor evoked potential of the effector that might need to be stopped in the future was significantly reduced compared with when that effector was at rest. Further, this neural index of proactive and selective suppression predicted the subsequent selectivity with which the behavioral response was stopped. These results go further than earlier reports of reduced motor excitability when responses are stopped. They show that the control can be applied in advance (proactively) and also targeted at a particular response channel (selectively). This provides novel evidence for an active mechanism of suppression in the brain that is setup according to the subject's goals and even before action ensues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available