4.7 Article

Comparison of Strategy Signals in the Dorsolateral and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 12, Pages 4583-4592

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5816-10.2011

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Division of Intramural Research of the National Institute of Mental Health [Z01MH-01092]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [21119513]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [22700340]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21119513, 22700340] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

behavior-guiding rules and strategies allow monkeys to avoid errors in rarely encountered situations. In the present study, we contrasted strategy-related neuronal activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFdl) and the orbital prefrontal cortex (PFo) of rhesus monkeys. On each trial of their behavioral task, the monkeys responded to a foveal visual cue by making a saccade to one of two spatial targets. One response required a leftward saccade, the other required a saccade of equal magnitude to the right. The cues instructed the monkeys to follow one of two response strategies: to stay with their most recent successful response or to shift to the alternative response. Neurons in both areas encoded the stay and shift strategies after the cue appeared, but there were three major differences between the PFo and the PFdl: (1) manystrategy-encoding cells in PFdl also encoded the response (left or right), but few, if any, PFo cells did so; (2) strategy selectivity appeared earlier in PFo than in PFdl; and (3) on error trials, PFo neurons encoded the correct strategy-the one that had been cued but not implemented-whereas in PFdl the strategy signals were weak or absent on error trials. These findings indicate that PFo and PFdl both contribute to behaviors guided by abstract response strategies, but do so differently, with PFo encoding a strategy and PFdl encoding a response based on a strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available