4.7 Article

Degeneracy and Neuromodulation among Thermosensory Neurons Contribute to Robust Thermosensory Behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 32, Pages 11718-11727

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1098-11.2011

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 GM081639, P30 NS45713, T32 EB009419]
  2. National Science Foundation [DGE-0549390]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animals must ensure that they can execute behaviors important for physiological homeostasis under constantly changing environmental conditions. The neural mechanisms that regulate this behavioral robustness are not well understood. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans thermoregulates primarily via modulation of navigation behavior. Upon encountering temperatures higher than its cultivation temperature (T(c)), C. elegans exhibits negative thermotaxis toward colder temperatures using a biased random walk strategy. We find that C. elegans exhibits robust negative thermotaxis bias under conditions of varying T(c) and temperature ranges. By cell ablation and cell-specific rescue experiments, we show that the ASI chemosensory neurons are newly identified components of the thermosensory circuit, and that different combinations of ASI and the previously identified AFD and AWC thermosensory neurons are necessary and sufficient under different conditions to execute a negative thermotaxis strategy. ASI responds to temperature stimuli within a defined operating range defined by T(c), and signaling from AFD regulates the bounds of this operating range, suggesting that neuromodulation among thermosensory neurons maintains coherence of behavioral output. Our observations demonstrate that a negative thermotaxis navigational strategy can be generated via different combinations of thermosensory neurons acting degenerately, and emphasize the importance of defining context when analyzing neuronal contributions to a behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available