4.7 Article

How the Optic Nerve Allocates Space, Energy Capacity, and Information

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 29, Issue 24, Pages 7917-7928

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5200-08.2009

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [08124, R01 EY03014]
  2. National Science Foundation [0344678]
  3. Institute for Advanced Study
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0344678] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fiber tracts should use space and energy efficiently, because both resources constrain neural computation. We found for a myelinated tract (optic nerve) that astrocytes use nearly 30% of the space and >70% of the mitochondria, establishing the significance of astrocytes for the brain's space and energy budgets. Axons are mostly thin with a skewed distribution peaking at 0.7 mu m, near the lower limit set by channel noise. This distribution is matched closely by the distribution of mean firing rates measured under naturalistic conditions, suggesting that firing rate increases proportionally with axon diameter. In axons thicker than 0.7 mu m, mitochondria occupy a constant fraction of axonal volume-thus, mitochondrial volumes rise as the diameter squared. These results imply a law of diminishing returns: twice the information rate requires more than twice the space and energy capacity. We conclude that the optic nerve conserves space and energy by sending most information at low rates over fine axons with small terminal arbors and sending some information at higher rates over thicker axons with larger terminal arbors but only where more bits per second are needed for a specific purpose. Thicker axons seem to be needed, not for their greater conduction velocity (nor other intrinsic electrophysiological purpose), but instead to support larger terminal arbors and more active zones that transfer information synaptically at higher rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available