4.7 Article

Outwardly Rectifying Tonically Active GABAA Receptors in Pyramidal Cells Modulate Neuronal Offset, Not Gain

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 29, Issue 48, Pages 15341-15350

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2747-09.2009

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. European Research Council
  3. European Integrated Project EPICURE [EFP6-037315]
  4. MRC [G0400136, G116/147, G0501424] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G0501424, G0400136, G116/147, G0601943B] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hippocampal pyramidal cell excitability is regulated both by fast synaptic inhibition and by tonically active high-affinity extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors. The impact of tonic inhibition on neuronal gain and offset, and thus on information processing, is unclear. Offset is altered by shunting inhibition, and the gain of a neuronal response to an excitatory input can be modified by changing the level of background synaptic noise. Therefore, tonic activation of GABA(A) receptors would be expected to modulate offset and, in addition, to alter gain through a shunting effect on synaptic noise. Here we show that tonically active GABA(A) receptors in CA1 pyramidal cells show marked outward rectification, while the peaks of IPSCs exhibit a linear current-voltage relationship. As a result, tonic GABA(A) receptor-mediated currents have a minimal effect upon subthreshold membrane potential variation due to synaptic noise, but predominantly affect neurons at spiking threshold. Consistent with this, tonic GABA(A) receptor-mediated currents in pyramidal cells exclusively affect offset and not gain. Modulation of tonically active GABA(A) receptors by fluctuations in extracellular GABA concentrations or neuromodulators acting on high-affinity receptors potentially provides a powerful mechanism to alter neuronal offset independently of neuronal gain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available