4.7 Article

Number and Locations of Agonist Binding Sites Required to Activate Homomeric Cys-Loop Receptors

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 29, Issue 18, Pages 6022-6032

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0627-09.2009

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS053521]
  2. Universidad Nacional del Sur
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica
  4. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientIficas y Tecnicas
  5. Loreal-United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  6. Fundacion Fiorini

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Homo-pentameric Cys-loop receptors contain five identical agonist binding sites, each formed at a subunit interface. To determine the number and locations of binding sites required to generate a stable active state, we constructed a receptor subunit with a mutation that disables the agonist binding site and a reporter mutation that alters unitary conductance and coexpressed mutant and nonmutant subunits. Although receptors with a range of different subunit compositions are produced, patch-clamp recordings reveal that the amplitude of each single-channel opening event reports the number and, for certain subunit combinations, the locations of subunits with intact binding sites. We find that receptors with three binding sites at nonconsecutive subunit interfaces exhibit maximal mean channel open time, receptors with binding sites at three consecutive or two nonconsecutive interfaces exhibit intermediate open time, and receptors with binding sites at two consecutive or one interface exhibit brief open time. Macroscopic recordings after rapid application of agonist reveal that channel activation slows and the extent of desensitization decreases as the number of binding sites per receptor decreases. The overall results provide a framework for defining mechanisms of activation and drug modulation for homo-pentameric Cys-loop receptors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available