4.7 Article

A role for non-rapid-eye-movement sleep homeostasis in perceptual learning

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 11, Pages 2766-2772

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5548-07.2008

Keywords

sleep homeostasis; slow-wave activity; slow-wave suppression; perceptual learning; texture discrimination; plasticity

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR02635, M01 RR002635] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Slow-wave activity (SWA; EEG power density in the 0.75-4.5 Hz range) in non-rapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep is the primary marker of sleep homeostasis and thought to reflect sleep need. But it is unknown whether the generation of SWA itself serves a fundamental function. Previously, SWA has been implicated in brain plasticity and learning, yet the evidence for a causal role remains correlative. Here, we used acoustic slow-wave suppression to test whether overnight improvement in visual texture discrimination, a form of perceptual learning, directly depends on SWA during sleep. Two groups of subjects were trained on a texture discrimination task (TDT) after baseline sleep, and were tested 24 h later, after a 4 h experimental (EX) sleep episode (with or without SWA suppression), and again after a night of recovery sleep. In the suppression group, SWA during EX sleep was reduced by 30% compared with the control group, whereas total sleep time and REM sleep were not affected. Texture discrimination improved after EX sleep in the control group but not in the suppression group. Moreover, overnight improvement in TDT performance correlated with EEG power density during NREM sleep in the frequency range of SWA (maximum r = 0.75 at 0.75-1.0 Hz) over brain areas involved in TDT learning. We conclude that SWA is an important determinant of sleep-dependent gains in perceptual performance, a finding that directly implicates processes of sleep homeostasis in learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available