4.7 Article

Aging impairs the unfolded protein response to sleep deprivation and leads to proapoptotic signaling

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 26, Pages 6539-6548

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5685-07.2008

Keywords

sleep deprivation; aging; ER stress; UPR; apoptotic signaling; BiP

Categories

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG17628, R21 AG025353, R21 AG025353-01, R21 AG025353-02, P01 AG017628, P01 AG017628-02, AG025353] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein misfolding, accumulation, and aggregation characterize many aging-related diseases. Protein aggregates do not accumulate in unstressed cells primarily because of the existence of competent cellular quality control machinery. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a major part of this quality control system. Accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER causes ER stress and activates a signaling pathway called the unfolded protein response (UPR). The UPR limits protein load by upregulating ER chaperones such as Ig binding protein (BiP)/glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and by attenuating protein translation through eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2 alpha) phosphorylation. Acute sleep deprivation (6 h) in young mice leads to induction of the UPR with upregulation of BiP/GRP78 and attenuation of protein translation. We demonstrate here that aging impairs this adaptive response to sleep deprivation. Aged mice do not display an increase in BiP expression with acute sleep deprivation. In addition, there is decreased basal expression of BiP/GRP78 in aged mice. There is a decline in eIF2 alpha phosphorylation in aged mouse cerebral cortex that is associated with higher levels of GADD34 (growth arrest and DNA damage 34) and proapoptotic proteins such as CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-homologous protein and activated caspase-12, suggesting that young animals possess an efficient ER adaptive response that declines with aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available