4.7 Article

Structural organization of the corpus callosum predicts the extent and impact of cortical activity in the nondominant hemisphere

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 11, Pages 2912-2918

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2295-07.2008

Keywords

corpus callosum; laterality; hemispheric asymmetry; memory; individual differences; neuroimaging

Categories

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS031443, P50 NS017778, R01NS031443-10A2, P50 NS17778] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) were combined to examine the relationship between callosal organization and cortical activity across hemispheres. Healthy young adults performed an incidental verbal encoding task (semantic judgments on words) while undergoing fMRI. Consistent with previous studies, the verbal encoding task was associated with left-lateralized activity in the inferior prefrontal cortex (LIPFC). When subjects were divided into two groups based on fractional anisotropy (FA) values in the anterior corpus callosum (DTI), individuals with low anterior callosal FA were found to exhibit greater activity in a homologous region within the right inferior prefrontal cortex (RIPFC) relative to those with high anterior callosal FA. Interestingly, whereas the magnitude of RIPFC activity did not negatively impact subsequent verbal memory performance for individuals with low anterior callosal FA, greater RIPFC activity during verbal encoding was associated with poorer subsequent memory performance for individuals with high anterior callosal FA. Together, these findings provide novel evidence that individual differences in callosal organization are related to the extent of nondominant cortical activity during performance during a lateralized task, and further, that this relationship has consequences on behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available