4.7 Article

Sleep accelerates the improvement in working memory performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 40, Pages 10145-10150

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2039-08.2008

Keywords

sleep; working memory capacity; memory consolidation; n-back task; skill learning; intelligence

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan [17302201]
  2. Ministry of Education, Sports, Science, and Culture of Japan [16614018]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16614018] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Working memory (WM) performance, which is an important factor for determining problem-solving and reasoning ability, has been firmly believed to be constant. However, recent findings have demonstrated that WM performance has the potential to be improved by repetitive training. Although various skills are reported to be improved by sleep, the beneficial effect of sleep on WM performance has not been clarified. Here, we show that improvement in WM performance is facilitated by posttraining naturalistic sleep. A spatial variant of the n-back WM task was performed by 29 healthy young adults who were assigned randomly to three different experimental groups that had different time schedules of repetitive n-back WM task sessions, with or without intervening sleep. Intergroup and intersession comparisons of WM performance (accuracy and response time) profiles showed that n-back accuracy after posttraining sleep was significantly improved compared with that after the same period of wakefulness, independent of sleep timing, subject's vigilance level, or circadian influences. On the other hand, response time was not influenced by sleep or repetitive training schedules. The present study indicates that improvement in n-back accuracy, which could reflect WM capacity, essentially benefits from posttraining sleep.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available