4.7 Article

Rat orbitofrontal cortex separately encodes response and outcome information during performance of goal-directed behavior

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 19, Pages 5127-5138

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0319-08.2008

Keywords

orbitofrontal cortex; orbital cortex; expected reward; behavioral response; associative learning; goal-directed behavior

Categories

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH060179, R01 MH060179-08] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) neurons encode rewards and the cues that predict them, providing a neural substrate for outcome expectancy, an important component of goal-directed behavior in animals and humans. Here, we recorded and analyzed single units from rat lateral OFC during performance of a task in which the encoding of an expected rewarding outcome could be isolated from the response made in obtaining it. We found concurrent encoding of the expected outcome and the behavioral response in mostly separate populations of OFC units, in each phase of task performance: odor sampling, behavioral response, and waiting during the delay before reward delivery. Population analyses showed that outcome encoding broadly spanned across each behavioral phase, whereas response-selective firings were time-locked to the behavioral events, especially the completion of the behavioral response. A significant subset of outcome-selective units maintained selective firings from either odor sampling or response initiation until reward delivery. In contrast, response-selective units typically showed transient activation time locked to the behavioral events and were less likely to maintain selective firings across behavioral phases than outcome-selective units. These data demonstrate a broader role of OFC information processing in goal-directed behavior, beyond its widely recognized role in outcome expectancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available