4.4 Article

Effects of repeated walking in a perturbing environment: a 4-day locomotor learning study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages 275-284

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01098.2011

Keywords

locomotion; adaptation; electromyographic activity; movement error

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Multidisciplinary Team in Locomotor Rehabilitation (CIHR)
  3. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration
  4. Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec (FRSQ)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blanchette A, Moffet H, Roy J, Bouyer LJ. Effects of repeated walking in a perturbing environment: a 4-day locomotor learning study. J Neurophysiol 108: 275-284, 2012. First published April 11, 2012; doi:10.1152/jn.01098.2011.-Previous studies have shown that when subjects repeatedly walk in a perturbing environment, initial movement error becomes smaller, suggesting that retention of the adapted locomotor program occurred (learning). It has been proposed that the newly learned locomotor program may be stored separately from the baseline program. However, how locomotor performance evolves with repeated sessions of walking with the perturbation is not yet known. To address this question, 10 healthy subjects walked on a treadmill on 4 consecutive days. Each day, locomotor performance was measured using kinematics and surface electromyography (EMGs), before, during, and after exposure to a perturbation, produced by an elastic tubing that pulled the foot forward and up during swing, inducing a foot velocity error in the first strides. Initial movement error decreased significantly between days 1 and 2 and then remained stable. Associated changes in medial hamstring EMG activity stabilized only on day 3, however. Aftereffects were present after perturbation removal, suggesting that daily adaptation involved central command recalibration of the baseline program. Aftereffects gradually decreased across days but were still visible on day 4. Separation between the newly learned and baseline programs may take longer than suggested by the daily improvement in initial performance in the perturbing environment or may never be complete. These results therefore suggest that reaching optimal performance in a perturbing environment should not be used as the main indicator of a completed learning process, as central reorganization of the motor commands continues days after initial performance has stabilized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available