Journal
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages 1766-1781Publisher
AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00460.2011
Keywords
central pattern generation; rhythm generation; interneuron; swim; oscillator
Categories
Funding
- National Science Foundation [IOB-0349620, IOS-0950370, DMS-1021701, EMSW21-RTG 0739261]
- Department of Zoology of the University of Oklahoma
- Direct For Biological Sciences
- Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0950370] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
- Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1021701] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Division Of Mathematical Sciences
- Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [739261] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Hao ZZ, Spardy LE, Nguyen EB, Rubin JE, Berkowitz A. Strong interactions between spinal cord networks for locomotion and scratching. J Neurophysiol 106: 1766-1781, 2011. First published July 6, 2011; doi: 10.1152/jn.00460.2011.-Distinct rhythmic behaviors involving a common set of motoneurons and muscles can be generated by separate central nervous system (CNS) networks, a single network, or partly overlapping networks in invertebrates. Less is known for vertebrates. Simultaneous activation of two networks can reveal overlap or interactions between them. The turtle spinal cord contains networks that generate locomotion and three forms of scratching (rostral, pocket, and caudal), having different knee-hip synergies. Here, we report that in immobilized spinal turtles, simultaneous delivery of types of stimulation, which individually evoked forward swimming and one form of scratching, could 1) increase the rhythm frequency; 2) evoke switches, hybrids, and intermediate motor patterns; 3) recruit a swim motor pattern even when the swim stimulation was reduced to subthreshold intensity; and 4) disrupt rhythm generation entirely. The strength of swim stimulation could influence the result. Thus even pocket scratching and caudal scratching, which do not share a knee-hip synergy with forward swimming, can interact with swim stimulation to alter both rhythm and pattern generation. Model simulations were used to explore the compatibility of our experimental results with hypothetical network architectures for rhythm generation. Models could reproduce experimental observations only if they included interactions between neurons involved in swim and scratch rhythm generation, with maximal consistency between simulations and experiments attained using a model architecture in which certain neurons participated actively in both swim and scratch rhythmogenesis. Collectively, these findings suggest that the spinal cord networks that generate locomotion and scratching have important shared components or strong interactions between them.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available