4.4 Article

Choosing to Make an Effort: The Role of Striatum in Signaling Physical Effort of a Chosen Action

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages 313-321

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00027.2010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kurniawan IT, Seymour B, Talmi D, Yoshida W, Chater N, Dolan RJ. Choosing to make an effort: the role of striatum in signaling physical effort of a chosen action. J Neurophysiol 104: 313-321, 2010. First published May 12, 2010; doi:10.1152/jn.00027.2010. The possibility that we will have to invest effort influences our future choice behavior. Indeed deciding whether an action is actually worth taking is a key element in the expression of human apathy or inertia. There is a well developed literature on brain activity related to the anticipation of effort, but how effort affects actual choice is less well understood. Furthermore, prior work is largely restricted to mental as opposed to physical effort or has confounded temporal with effortful costs. Here we investigated choice behavior and brain activity, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, in a study where healthy participants are required to make decisions between effortful gripping, where the factors of force ( high and low) and reward ( high and low) were varied, and a choice of merely holding a grip device for minimal monetary reward. Behaviorally, we show that force level influences the likelihood of choosing an effortful grip. We observed greater activity in the putamen when participants opt to grip an option with low effort compared with when they opt to grip an option with high effort. The results suggest that, over and above a nonspecific role in movement anticipation and salience, the putamen plays a crucial role in computations for choice that involves effort costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available