4.4 Article

Relevance of Error: What Drives Motor Adaptation?

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages 655-664

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.90545.2008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Falk Trust and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS-057814-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wei K, Kording K. Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? J Neurophysiol 101: 655-664, 2009. First published November 19, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90545.2008. During motor adaptation the nervous system constantly uses error information to improve future movements. Today's mainstream models simply assume that the nervous system adapts linearly and proportionally to errors. However, not all movement errors are relevant to our own action. The environment may transiently disturb the movement production-for example, a gust of wind blows the tennis ball away from its intended trajectory. Apparently the nervous system should not adapt its motor plan in the subsequent tennis strokes based on this irrelevant movement error. We hypothesize that the nervous system estimates the relevance of each observed error and adapts strongly only to relevant errors. Here we present a Bayesian treatment of this problem. The model calculates how likely an error is relevant to the motor plant and derives an ideal adaptation strategy that leads to the most precise movements. This model predicts that adaptation should be a nonlinear function of the size of an error. In reaching experiments we found strong evidence for the predicted nonlinear strategy. The model also explains published data on saccadic gain adaptation, adaptation to visuomotor rotations, and force perturbations. Our study suggests that the nervous system constantly and effortlessly estimates the relevance of observed movement errors for successful motor adaptation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available