4.4 Article

GABAA Receptor α5 Subunits Contribute to GABAA,slow Synaptic Inhibition in Mouse Hippocampus

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages 1179-1191

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.91203.2008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01-GM-47818, R01-NS-056411]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100A0-102113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zarnowska ED, Keist R, Rudolph U, Pearce RA. GABA(A) receptor alpha 5 subunits contribute to GABA(A,slow) synaptic inhibition in mouse hippocampus. J Neurophysiol 101: 1179-1191, 2009. First published December 10, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.91203.2008. gamma-Aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor alpha 5 subunits, which are heavily expressed in the hippocampus, are potential drug targets for improving cognitive function. They are found at synaptic and extrasynaptic sites and have been shown to mediate tonic inhibition in pyramidal neurons. We tested the hypothesis that alpha 5 subunits also contribute to synaptic inhibition by measuring the effect of diazepam (DZ) on spontaneous and stimulus-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in genetically modified mice carrying a point mutation in the alpha 5 subunit (alpha 5-H105R) that renders those receptors insensitive to benzodiazepines. In wild type mice, DZ (1 mu M) increased the amplitude of spontaneous IPSCs (sIPSCs) and stimulus-evoked GABA(A,slow) IPSCs (eIPSCs) and prolonged the decay of GABA(A,fast) sIPSCs. In alpha 5-mutant mice, DZ increased the amplitude of a small-amplitude subset of sIPSCs (< 50 pA) and eIPSCs (< 300 pA) GABA(A,slow) and prolonged the decay of GABA(A,fast) sIPSCs, but failed to increase the amplitude of larger sIPSCs and eIPSCs GABA(A,slow). These results indicate that alpha 5 subunits contribute to a large-amplitude subset of GABA(A,slow) synapses and implicate these synapses in modulation of cognitive function by drugs that target alpha 5 subunits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available