4.4 Article

Neural Representation of Hand Kinematics During Prehension in Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque Monkey

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 6, Pages 3310-3328

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.90942.2008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [R01 NS-011862, R56 NS-011862, R01 NS-044820]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R01 NS-044820]
  3. National Institute on Aging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chen J, Reitzen SD, Kohlenstein JB, Gardner EP. Neural representation of hand kinematics during prehension in posterior parietal cortex of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 102: 3310-3328, 2009. First published September 30, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.90942.2008. Studies of hand manipulation neurons in posterior parietal cortex of monkeys suggest that their spike trains represent objects by the hand postures needed for grasping or by the underlying patterns of muscle activation. To analyze the role of hand kinematics and object properties in a trained prehension task, we correlated the firing rates of neurons in anterior area 5 with hand behaviors as monkeys grasped and lifted knobs of different shapes and locations in the workspace. Trials were divided into four classes depending on the approach trajectory: forward, lateral, and local approaches, and regrasps. The task factors controlled by the animal-how and when he used the hand-appeared to play the principal roles in modulating firing rates of area 5 neurons. In all, 77% of neurons studied (58/75) showed significant effects of approach style on firing rates; 80% of the population responded at higher rates and for longer durations on forward or lateral approaches that included reaching, wrist rotation, and hand preshaping prior to contact, but only 13% distinguished the direction of reach. The higher firing rates in reach trials reflected not only the arm movements needed to direct the hand to the target before contact, but persisted through the contact, grasp, and lift stages. Moreover, the approach style exerted a stronger effect on firing rates than object features, such as shape and location, which were distinguished by half of the population. Forty-three percent of the neurons signaled both the object properties and the hand actions used to acquire them. However, the spread in firing rates evoked by each knob on reach and no-reach trials was greater than distinctions between different objects grasped with the same approach style. Our data provide clear evidence for synergies between reaching and grasping that may facilitate smooth, coordinated actions of the arm and hand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available