4.3 Article

Gene Expression Profiling of NF-1-Associated and Sporadic Pilocytic Astrocytoma Identifies Aldehyde Dehydrogenase I Family Member L1 (ALDHIL1) as an Underexpressed Candidate Biomarker in Aggressive Subtypes

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPATHOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 12, Pages 1194-1204

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31818fbe1e

Keywords

Brain turner; Glioma; Microarray; Molecular signature; Neurofibromatosis; Pilocytic astrocytoma

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [T32 NS07494-04]
  2. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology [31170]
  3. Mayo Clinic
  4. SchmIck Markets, Inc
  5. Mayo SPORE in Brain Cancer [P50 CA108961]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pilocytic astrocytomas (PAs) are World Health Organization Grade I gliomas; they most often affect children and young adults and occur in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). To identify genes that are differentially expressed in sporadic (S-PA) versus NF1-associated PAs (NF1-PAs) and those that might reflect differences in clinical behavior, we performed gene expression profiling using Affymetrix U133 Plus2.0 GeneChip arrays in 36 S-PAs and 11 NF1-PAs. Thirteen genes were overexpressed, and another 13 genes were underexpressed in NF1-PAs relative to S-PAs. Immunohistochemical Studies performed on 103 tumors, representing 2 independently generated tissue microarrays, confirmed the differential expression of CUGBP2 (p = 0.0014), RANBP9 (p = 0.0075), ITGAV1 (p = 0.0001), and INFGR1 (p = 0.024) proteins. One of the underexpressed genes, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family mernberL1 (ALDHIL1), was also reduced in clinically aggressive compared with typical PAs (p = 0.01) and in PAs with increased cellularity and necrosis. Furthermore, in an additional independent set of tumors, weak to absent ALDHIL1 expression was found in 13 (72%) of 18 clinically aggressive PAs,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available