4.6 Article

Differentiation of frontotemporal dementia from dementia with Lewy bodies using FP-CIT SPECT

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 83, Issue 11, Pages 1063-1070

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302577

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GE Healthcare (free FP-CIT ligands for FTD cases)
  2. GE Healthcare
  3. Bayer Healthcare
  4. Novartis
  5. Lundbeck
  6. GE Healthcare Ligand [DAT-08-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction There is increasing evidence that imaging with [I-123]FP-CIT SPECT is helpful in differentiating dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) from Alzheimer's disease (AD) but it is not known how well the scan performs in differentiating DLB from frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Method We compared the striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) binding in FTD (n=12), DLB (n=10) and AD (n=9) by visually rating the caudate and putamen on [I-123]FP-CIT SPECT scans. Results The majority (9/10) of DLB cases had an abnormal scan and a significant reduction of uptake of DAT binding in the putamen and the caudate. A third (4/12) of the FTD cases also had an abnormal scan and a significant reduction in uptake in the putamen and the caudate. In contrast, only one out of nine AD cases had an abnormal scan. Significant differences were found when comparisons were made between the groups for visual analysis of the entire scan (p=0.001) and the four regions of interest (p=0.001 - 0.013). In contrast to the AD group (specificity of scan 89%), the specificity of [I-123]FP-CIT SPECT scans was reduced in the FTD group to 67%. Three quarters of the study population had at least one extrapyramidal motor sign (EPMS), with bradykinesia being the most common EPMS in both FTD (83%) and DLB (70%). Conclusions This study highlights to clinicians that a positive (abnormal) [I-123]FP-CIT SPECT scan, even in a patient with an EPMS, does not exclude the diagnosis of FTD and emphasises the importance of a comprehensive clinical evaluation and a detailed cognitive assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available