4.6 Article

What is the clinically relevant change on the ADAS-Cog?

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 171-173

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-300881

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres
  2. Alzheimer's Research UK
  3. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health) [U01 AG024904]
  4. National Institute on Ageing, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  5. NIH [P30 AG010129, K01 AG030514]
  6. Dana Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To establish the minimal clinically relevant change (MCRC) on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) for patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). Design Cohort study. Setting 59 recruiting sites for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Patients Outpatients with AD in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Main outcome measures The authors applied anchor-based MCRC methodology comparing ADAS-Cog change against clinicians' judgement of clinically relevant worsening between baseline and 6 months in four domains: memory and non-memory cognitive performance; Clinical Dementia Rating Scale; and Functional Assessment Questionnaire. The analysis was repeated for the 6-12-month interval. To support these findings, the authors calculated distribution-based measures including half-baseline SD (1/2 SD) and SEM. Results 181 patients (baseline ADAS-Cog score 18.5 +/- 6.4) had ADAS-Cog data at 0 and 6 months. Those undergoing clinically significant worsening on any of the four anchor questions (n=41-47) had an average ADAS-Cog change of 3.1-3.8 points. Similar results were found for the 177 patients with 6-12-month data. The average 1/2 SD for the baseline ADAS-Cog score was 3.2, and the SEM was 3.7. Conclusions 3 points decline on the ADAS-Cog may be an appropriate MCRC for clinical trials of patients with early AD. However, further studies assessing the MCRC for improvement on the ADAS-Cog, using patient-based judgement as an anchor, and determining the minimal clinically relevant difference between change on two treatments are required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available