4.6 Article

An estimate of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis heritability using twin data

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 81, Issue 12, Pages 1324-1326

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.207464

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bjorklunds Fond [2008-20892]
  2. British Geriatric Society
  3. Medical Research Council (UK)
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. Motor Neurone Disease Association of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  6. American ALS Association
  7. ALS Therapy Alliance
  8. Angel Fund
  9. MRC [G0600974, G0900688] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [G0600974, G0900688, G9817803B] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Causative gene mutations have been identified in about 2% of those with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), often, but not always, when there is a strong family history. There is an assumption that there is a genetic component to all ALS, but genome-wide association studies have yet to produce a robustly replicated result. A definitive estimate of ALS heritability is therefore required to determine whether ongoing efforts to find susceptibility genes are worth while. Methods The authors performed two twin studies, one population-and one clinic-based. The authors used structural equation modelling to perform a meta-analysis of data from these studies and an existing twin study to estimate ALS heritability, and identified 171 twin pairs in which at least one twin had ALS. Results and discussion Five monozygotic twin pairs were concordant-affected, and 44 discordant-affected. No dizygotic twin pairs were concordant-affected, and 122 discordant-affected. The heritability of sporadic ALS was estimated as 0.61 (0.38 to 0.78) with the unshared environmental component 0.39 (0.22 to 0.62). ALS has a high heritability, and efforts to find causative genes should continue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available