4.6 Article

MRI shows increased sciatic nerve cross sectional area in inherited and inflammatory neuropathies

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 82, Issue 11, Pages 1283-1286

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.211334

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases
  2. UCL Institute of Neurology
  3. AlBan
  4. European Union
  5. Caja de Seguro Social (CSS), Panama
  6. MRC
  7. Muscular Dystrophy Campaign
  8. Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres
  9. MRC [G0601943] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [G0601943] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurements of the cross sectional area of the sciatic nerve are described in a group of 10 patients with genetically confirmed Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A), nine patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and 10 healthy controls using MRI. One mid-thigh of each individual was imaged using a short tau inversion recovery sequence and the nerve appearance evaluated radiologically with respect to the signal intensity and visibility of the internal neural structure. The cross sectional area of the sciatic nerve of each individual was measured by defining irregular enclosing regions of interest on the MRI images. The sciatic nerve area was enlarged in both CMT1A (p<0.001) and CIDP (p=0.008) compared with controls and in CMT1A compared with CIDP (p<0.001). Median (interquartile range) areas were 67.6 (16.2) mm(2) for the CIDP group, 135.9 (46.5) mm(2) for the CMT1A group and 43.3 (19.9) mm(2) for the control group. The critical upper value for discriminating pathologically enlarged nerves from normal controls with p<0.05 was 64.4 mm(2). Quantification of sciatic nerve hypertrophy on MRI may be of assistance in cases where the diagnosis is still in doubt, providing an objective pathological marker complimenting other clinical investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available