4.6 Review

Diagnosis and new treatments in muscular dystrophies

Journal

POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 85, Issue 1009, Pages 622-630

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.158329

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre
  2. UK NorthStar Clinical Network for Paediatric Neuromuscular Disorders
  3. MRC Neuromuscular Centre
  4. Muscular Dystrophy Campaign UK
  5. Department of Health
  6. Medical Research Council
  7. AVI Biopharma
  8. MRC [G0601943] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Medical Research Council [G0601943] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) and limb girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMD) represent a significant proportion of paediatric and adult neuromuscular neurology practice. The proactive symptom-based multidisciplinary team (MDT) management and access to non-invasive ventilation have enabled improved survival into adulthood. Nevertheless the severe disability imposed by conditions such as DMD poses a challenge for successful transition of care and management for paediatric and adult neurology teams. DMD is discussed in detail as a paradigm illustrating diagnosis, management and role for different pharmacological interventions to improve survival, but also challenges in adulthood care, and cutting-edge therapies. LGMDs are much rarer than DMD and BMD, and in addition there is a significant genetic and clinical heterogeneity, which leads to diagnostic difficulties. The clinical and laboratory diagnostic features of seven LGMD subtypes are summarised, and their allelic non-limb girdle phenotypes are tabulated to illustrate the theme of one gene causing multiple clinical phenotypes, with the aim of refining the clinician's diagnostic approach. The lessons learnt from DMD MDT management to improve survival are broadly applicable to LGMDs with severe motor disability/multisystem complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available