4.7 Article

Factors predicting protracted improvement after pallidal DBS for primary dystonia: the role of age and disease duration

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 258, Issue 8, Pages 1469-1476

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-011-5961-9

Keywords

Deep brain stimulation; Globus pallidus; Dystonia; Outcome predictors

Funding

  1. Bachmann-Strauss Dystonia & Parkinson Foundation
  2. Mariani Foundation for Paediatric Neurology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In many patients, optimal results after pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) for primary dystonia may appear over several months, possibly beyond 1 year after implant. In order to elucidate the factors predicting such protracted clinical effect, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 44 patients with primary dystonia and bilateral pallidal DBS implants. Patients with fixed skeletal deformities, as well as those with a history of prior ablative procedures, were excluded. The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scores at baseline, 1 and 3 years after DBS were used to evaluate clinical outcome. All subjects showed a significant improvement after DBS implants (mean BFMDRS improvement of 74.9% at 1 year and 82.6% at 3 years). Disease duration (DD, median 15 years, range 2-42) and age at surgery (AS, median 31 years, range 10-59) showed a significant negative correlation with DBS outcome at 1 and 3 years. A partition analysis, using DD and AS, clustered subjects into three groups: (1) younger subjects with shorter DD (n = 19, AS < 27, DD a parts per thousand currency sign 17); (2) older subjects with shorter DD (n = 8, DD a parts per thousand currency sign 17, AS a parts per thousand yen 27); (3) older subjects with longer DD (n = 17, DD > 17, AS a parts per thousand yen 27). Younger patients with short DD benefitted more and faster than older patients, who however continued to improve 10% on average 1 year after DBS implants. Our data suggest that subjects with short DD may expect to achieve a better general outcome than those with longer DD and that AS may influence the time necessary to achieve maximal clinical response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available