4.7 Article

Diffusion-weighted imaging in noncompressive myelopathies: a 33-patient prospective study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 257, Issue 9, Pages 1438-1445

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-010-5538-z

Keywords

Diffusion-weighted MRI; Spinal cord infarction; Inflammatory myelopathy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is frequently used to differentiate cerebral lesions. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of DWI and the measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in noncompressive myelopathy explorations. Thirty-three patients presenting a spinal cord syndrome due to a noncompressive myelopathy underwent spinal cord MRI between September 2005 and November 2008. For each patient, the ADC was calculated in the pathological spinal cord. ADC values were also measured in the healthy spinal cord of ten control subjects. Statistical analysis was based on the Student's t test. Twenty-one patients presented an inflammatory myelopathy: Nine patients presented multiple sclerosis, three patients presented a parainfectious myelopathy, two patients acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, one patient neuromyelitis optica, one patient systemic lupus erythematosus, and five patients a myelopathy of unknown aetiology. Six patients presented a spinal cord infarction. ADC values were significantly lower in spinal cord infarct (mean ADC = 0.81 +/- A 0.08 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than in inflammatory spinal cord lesions (mean ADC = 1.37 +/- A 0.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and in healthy control spinal cord (mean ADC = 0.93 +/- A 0.07 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s). These results are important to differentiate ischaemic from inflammatory myelopathies, especially at the acute phase when clinical presentation and extensive work-up are not able to show an aetiologic diagnosis. Although these results are similar to those described in cerebral explorations, ADC measurements remain technically limited for the moment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available