4.7 Article

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in human genetic transmissible spongiform encephalopathies

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 256, Issue 10, Pages 1620-1628

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-009-5163-x

Keywords

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; CSF proteins; 14-3-3 protein; Tau

Funding

  1. European Commission (EC) [QLG3-CT-2002-81606]
  2. Greek Ministry of Health, through KEEL, in Italy
  3. Ministry of Health and the Istituto Superiore di Sanita, in the Netherlands
  4. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [MCyT EET 2001/2216]
  5. Spanish Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo [DGVI 1312/04-1]
  6. Bundesamt fur Gesundheit, Bern [03.001297, 04.002363]
  7. Department of Health
  8. Scottish Home Office Department of Health
  9. Bundesministerium fur Gesundheit und Soziale Sicherung (BMGS) [GZ: 325-4471-02/15]
  10. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [KZ: 0312720]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 14-3-3 protein test has been shown to support the clinical diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) when associated with an adequate clinical context, and a high differential potential for the diagnosis of sporadic CJD has been attributed to other cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins such as tau protein, S100b and neuron specific enolase (NSE). So far there has been only limited information available about biochemical markers in genetic transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (gTSE), although they represent 10-15% of human TSEs. In this study, we analyzed CSF of 174 patients with gTSEs for 14-3-3 (n = 166), tau protein (n = 78), S100b (n = 46) and NSE (n = 50). Levels of brain-derived proteins in CSF varied in different forms of gTSE. Biomarkers were found positive in the majority of gCJD (81%) and insert gTSE (69%), while they were negative in most cases of fatal familial insomnia (13%) and Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome (10%). Disease duration and codon 129 genotype influence the findings in a different way than in sporadic CJD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available