4.7 Article

Brain anomalies in maternally inherited diabetes and deafness syndrome

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 256, Issue 10, Pages 1696-1704

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-009-5185-4

Keywords

Mitochondrial diabetes; MIDD; MELAS; Brain dysfunction; Cerebellar atrophy; H-1-MR spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maternally inherited diabetes and deafness (MIDD) and myoencephalopathy, lactic acidosis, stroke-like episodes (MELAS) syndromes are characterized by the same A3243G mutation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Should there be a link between these two clinical entities, one could expect to observe minor signs of MELAS in MIDD patients. To examine this issue, extensive evaluations of brain function and imaging in patients with mitochondrial diabetes and in age-matched type 1 diabetic patients were conducted and compared. MIDD patients (nine A3243G, two T14709G) and nine age-matched type 1 diabetic patients (T1D) were submitted for evaluation of cognitive functions, brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and H-1-MR spectroscopy. Three MIDD patients exhibited cerebellar ataxia. The MIDD group exhibited poorer performances in sustained attention, verbal memory working, and abstract reasoning procedures, in comparison with the T1D group. MR imaging showed cerebellar atrophy in seven out of ten MIDD patients (versus 3 mild/8 in T1D controls) and basal ganglia calcifications in one MIDD patient. No evidence of (sub)acute stroke was detected. White-matter anomalies were observed in both groups (50%). H-1-MR spectroscopy revealed a significant decrease of N-acetyl aspartate only in vermis in the MIDD group, suggesting functional defect and/or neuronal loss. Lactate was detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in two MIDD and one T1D patient. Typical manifestations of MELAS are rare in MIDD syndrome, suggesting two different clinical entities. However, cerebellum involvement as assessed by imaging and H-1-MR spectroscopy is shared by both phenotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available