4.4 Article

Dimensions of the posterior cerebral circulation: an analysis based on advanced non-invasive imaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 597-600

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010549

Keywords

CT Angiography; Artery; Posterior fossa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Our goal was to provide measurements of the posterior cerebral circulation using non-invasive imaging and advanced software analysis tools. Methods 100 consecutive patients aged 40years (50 men and 50 women) who had undergone CT angiography (CTA) but had no vascular abnormality were analyzed. Specific software was used to make vessel measurements along the center line. The length of the intracranial vertebral artery (VA), the basilar artery (BA) and the distance from the mid-basilar artery to the posterior cerebral artery (mBA-PCA) was recorded. Vessel diameter was measured at the proximal and distal ends of these vessel lengths. Vessel taper was calculated as the change in diameter in millimeters per centimeter of length. Results The mean lengths of the intracranial VA, the BA and the mBA-PCA were 4010.6mm, 27.3 +/- 5.7mm and 25.6 +/- 4.3mm, respectively. The proximal and distal diameters were 3.9 +/- 0.8mm and 2.8 +/- 0.6mm for the VA and 3.6 +/- 0.6mm and 3.1 +/- 0.5mm for the BA, respectively. The mean mid-BA diameter and the proximal PCA diameter were 3.2 +/- 0.5mm and 2.2 +/- 0.4mm, respectively. There was a significant increase in arterial caliber in patients aged 60years compared with those aged 40-59years. Men also tended to have longer vessels with a larger diameter than women. Conclusions Advanced software and non-invasive imaging can be used to perform accurate vessel analysis. The posterior circulation measurements showed an increase in arterial caliber with age. This baseline information may be useful in planning neurovascular procedures and endovascular device development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available