4.4 Article

Photoprotective capacity of non-photochemical quenching in plants acclimated to different light intensities

Journal

PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH
Volume 126, Issue 2-3, Pages 261-274

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11120-015-0102-4

Keywords

Arabidopsis; Protective NPQ; Photosystem II; Light acclimation; LHCII

Categories

Funding

  1. Queen Mary Principal's research studentship
  2. Leverhulme Trust
  3. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  4. BBSRC [BB/L019027/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L019027/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arabidopsis plants grown at low light were exposed to a gradually increasing actinic light routine. This method allows for the discerning of the photoprotective component of NPQ, pNPQ and photoinhibition. They exhibited lower values of Photosystem II (PSII) yield in comparison to high-light grown plants, and higher calculated dark fluorescence level (F'(o) (calc.)) than the measured one (F'(o) (act.)). As a result, in low-light grown plants, the values of qP measured in the dark appeared higher than 1. Normally, F'(o) (act.) and F'(o) (calc.) match well at moderate light intensities but F'(o) (act.) becomes higher at increasing intensities due to reaction centre (RCII) damage; this indicates the onset of photoinhibition. To explain the unusual increase of qP in the dark in low-light grown plants, we have undertaken an analysis of PSII antenna size using biochemical and spectroscopic approaches. Sucrose gradient separation of thylakoid membrane complexes and fast fluorescence induction experiments illustrated that the relative PSII cross section does not increase appreciably with the rise in PSII antenna size in the low-light grown plants. This suggests that part of the increased LHCII antenna is less efficiently coupled to the RCII. A model based upon the existence of an uncoupled population LHCII is proposed to explain the discrepancies in calculated and measured values of F'(o).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available