4.7 Article

GRK5 deficiency exaggerates inflammatory changes in TgAPPsw mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROINFLAMMATION
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-5-24

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Deficiency of membrane G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) kinase-5 (GRK5) recently has been linked to early AD pathogenesis, and has been suggested to contribute to augmented microglial activation in vitro by sensitizing relevant GPCRs. However, GRK5 deficient mice did not show any signs of microgliosis, except for their moderate increase in axonal defects and synaptic degenerative changes during aging. We have speculated that one possible reason for the absence of microgliosis in these animals might be due to lack of an active inflammatory process involving activated GPCR signaling, since GRKs only act on activated GPCRs. The objective of this study was to determine whether the microgliosis is exaggerated in TgAPPsw ( Tg2576) mice also deficient in GRK5, in which fibrillar beta-amyloid (A beta) and an active inflammatory process involving activated GPCR signaling are present. Methods: Both quantitative and qualitative immunochemistry methods were used to evaluate the microgliosis and astrogliosis in these animals. Results: We found that inactivation of one copy of the GRK5 gene in the TgAPPsw mice resulted in approximately doubled extent of microgliosis, along with significantly exaggerated astrogliosis, in both hippocampus and cortex of the aged animals. Consistent with previous observations, the activated microglia were located primarily near or surrounding the fibrillar A beta deposits. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that GRK5 deficiency in vivo significantly exaggerates microgliosis and astrogliosis in the presence of an inflammatory initiator, such as the excess fibrillar A beta and the subsequent active inflammatory reactions in the TgAPPsw mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available