4.3 Article

Lipoic acid decreases inflammation and confers neuroprotection in experimental autoimmune optic neuritis

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNOLOGY
Volume 233, Issue 1-2, Pages 90-96

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.12.002

Keywords

Lipoic acid; Optic neuritis; EAON; Multiple sclerosis; Neuroprotection

Funding

  1. Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, National Multiple Sclerosis Society [CA1055A]
  2. NIH (Neuroscience Imaging Center at OHSU) [P30NS061800]
  3. Laura Fund for Innovation in Multiple Sclerosis Research
  4. Nancy Davis Center Without Walls

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lipoic acid (LA) is an antioxidant that is effective in treating experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model for multiple sclerosis (MS). C57BL/6 mice with EAE develop experimental autoimmune optic neuritis (EAON), which models acute optic neuritis in humans. Here we determined whether LA is therapeutically effective in EAON. We immunized C57BL/6 mice with MOG 35-55 peptide. Mice received either daily subcutaneous injections of LA (100 mg/kg) or saline in early or late suppression paradigms. In the early suppression paradigm, optic nerve cross-sections showed 14.9 +/- 3.8% (mean +/- SEM) damage in mice receiving saline (n = 7) and 2.0 +/- 0.4% damage in mice given LA (n = 7, p = 0.001). In the late suppression paradigm, optic nerve sections showed 24.6 +/- 3.5% damage in mice treated with saline (n = 7) and 8.4 +/- 2.5% in mice treated with LA (n = 7, p = 0.004). Thus a dramatic reduction in axonal injury was seen after LA administration in both experimental paradigms. Compared with saline treated mice with EAON, optic nerves from mice receiving LA had significantly fewer CD4+ and CD11b+ cells in both paradigms. This study provides a rationale for investigating the therapeutic efficacy of IA in acute optic neuritis in humans. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available