4.3 Article

A highly sensitive electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for the neurofilament heavy chain protein

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNOLOGY
Volume 220, Issue 1-2, Pages 114-119

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.01.004

Keywords

Neurofilament heavy chain (NfH); Electrochemiluminescence (ECL); Multiple sclerosis; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Guillain Barre syndrome; Mild cognitive impairment/Alzheimer's disease

Funding

  1. Swiss MS Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The loss of neurological function is closely related to axonal damage. Neurofilament subunits are concentrated in neurons and axons and have emerged as promising biomarkers for neurodegeneration. Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) based assays are known to be of superior sensitivity and require less sample volume than conventional ELISAs. Methods: We developed an ECL based solid-phase sandwich immunoassay to measure the neurofilament heavy chain protein (NfH(SMI35)) in CSF. We employed commercially available antibodies as previously used in a conventional ELISA (Petzold et al., 2003; Petzold and Shaw, 2007). The optimised and validated assay was applied in a reference cohort and defined patient groups. Results: Analytical sensitivity (background plus three SD) of our assay was 2.4 pg/ml. The mean intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 4.8% and the inter-assay CV 8.4%. All measured control and patient samples produced signals well above background. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) (median 46.2 pg/ml, n = 95), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (160.1 pg/ml, n = 50), mild cognitive impairment/Alzheimer's disease (MCI/AD) (65.6 pg/ml, n = 20), Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS) (91.0 pg/ml, n = 20) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (345.0 pg/ml, n = 20) had higher CSF NfH(SM135) values than the reference cohort (27.1 pg/ml, n = 73, p <0.0001 for each comparison). Conclusion: The new ECL based assay for NfH(SM135) in CSF is superior in terms of sensitivity, precision and accuracy to previously published methods (Petzold et al., 2003; Shaw et al., 2005; Teunissen et al., 2009). The improved performance and small sample volume requirement qualify this method in experimental settings and clinical trials designed to perform a number of tests on limited amounts of material. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available