4.2 Article

Iodine-123 Metaiodobenzylguanidine Scintigraphy and Iodine-123 Ioflupane Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Lewy Body Diseases: Complementary or Alternative Techniques?

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 149-154

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2012.00774.x

Keywords

Lewy body disease; Parkinson's disease; dementia with Lewy bodies; Metaiodobenzylguanidine; Ioflupane; nuclear medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSETo compare myocardial sympathetic imaging using I-123-Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy and striatal dopaminergic imaging using I-123-Ioflupane (FP-CIT) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with suspected Lewy body diseases (LBD). METHODSNinety-nine patients who performed both methods within 2 months for differential diagnosis between Parkinson's disease (PD) and other parkinsonism (n = 68) or between dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and other dementia (n = 31) were enrolled. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of both methods were calculated. RESULTSFor I-123-MIBG scintigraphy, the overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values in LBD were 83%, 79%, 82%, 86%, and 76%, respectively. For I-123-FP-CIT SPECT, the overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values in LBD were 93%, 41%, 73%, 71%, and 80%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between these two methods in patients without LBD, but not in patients with LBD. CONCLUSIONSLBD usually present both myocardial sympathetic and striatal dopaminergic impairments. I-123-FP-CIT SPECT presents high sensitivity in the diagnosis of LBD; I-123-MIBG scintigraphy may have a complementary role in differential diagnosis between PD and other parkinsonism. These scintigraphic methods showed similar diagnostic accuracy in differential diagnosis between DLB and other dementia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available