4.2 Article

High-resolution Diffusion Tensor Imaging for the Detection of Diffusion Abnormalities in the Trigeminal Nerves of Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Neurovascular Compression

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages e102-e108

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00508.x

Keywords

Trigeminal neuralgia; neurovascular compression; diffusion tensor imaging; tractography; fractional anisotropy

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [20591693]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20591693] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE To detect diffusion abnormalities in the trigeminal nerves of patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) caused by neurovascular compression (NVC) by using a high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging (HR-DTI) technique. METHODS Thirteen patients with TN and 14 healthy controls underwent HR-DTI scanning. After extracting the trigeminal nerve using a tractography technique, we measured the fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and compared the contralateral ratios (CR) of these parameters between the patients and controls, and correlated these ratios with the cross-sectional areas of the nerves. RESULTS The CRs of the FA values for the trigeminal nerves of the patients (1.00 +/- 0.15) had significantly higher variance than those of healthy controls (1.00 +/- 0.05) (P < .05) and showed a positive correlation with the cross-sectional area of the nerves (r = 0.81). In contrast, the CRs of the ADC values were not significantly different between the two groups (1.02 +/- 0.10 and 1.01 +/- 0.08, respectively) and had no significant correlation with cross-sectional area. CONCLUSION HR-DTI can detect an alteration in the relative FA values of affected trigeminal nerves and a correlation with atrophic changes in patients with NVC-induced TN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available