4.2 Article

Comparison of Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy with Fluorine-18 2-Fluoro-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Assessment of Brain Tumor Progression

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 184-190

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00561.x

Keywords

Glioma; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; positron emission tomography; MRS; FDG PET

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U01 CA140230, R01 CA106840-01A2, R01 CA106840, U01 CA140230-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES We investigated the accuracy of high-field proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-1 MRS) and fluorine-18 2-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-18-FDG-PET) for diagnosis of glioma progression following tumor resection, stereotactic radiation, and chemotherapy. METHODS Twelve post-therapy patients with histology proven gliomas (six grade II and six grade III) presented with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical symptoms suggestive but not conclusive of progression were entered into the study. H-1 MRS data were acquired and 3-dimensional volumetric maps of choline (Cho) over creatine (Cr) were generated. Intensity of F-18-FDG uptake was evaluated on a semiquantitative scale. RESULTS The accuracy of H-1 MRS and F-18-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosis of glioma progression was 75% and 83%, respectively. Classifying the tumors by grade improved accuracy of F-18-FDGPET to 100% in high-grade gliomas and accuracy of H-1 MRS to 80% in low-grade tumors. Spearman's analysis demonstrated a trend between F-18-FDG uptake and tumor grading (rho =.612, P-value =.272). The results of F-18-FDG-PET and H-1 MRS were concordant in 75% (9/12) of cases. CONCLUSION The combination of H-1 MRS data and F-18-FDG-PET imaging can enhance detection of glioma progression. H-1 MRS imaging was more accurate in low-grade gliomas and F-18-FDG-PET provided better accuracy in high-grade gliomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available