4.5 Article

Nicotine and cotinine increases the brain penetration of saquinavir in rat

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages 1495-1507

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07054.x

Keywords

blood-brain barrier; breast cancer resistance protein; highly active antiretroviral therapy; nicotine; P-glycoprotein; protease inhibitors; saquinavir

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Endothelial tight junctions and efflux transporters of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) significantly limit brain accumulation of many drugs, including protease inhibitors such as saquinavir. The cholinergic agonist nicotine is one of the most commonly used drugs in the world and the incidence is even higher in the human immune deficiency virus population (similar to 70%). We examined the ability of nicotine and its primary metabolite cotinine to modify brain uptake of saquinavir in rats. Both nicotine and cotinine at pharmacological concentrations matching those in smokers, increased brain saquinavir uptake by two fold. Co-perfusion with nicotinic receptor antagonists and passive permeability markers showed that the effect was not caused by receptor activation or BBB permeability disruption. Transport inhibition studies demonstrated that brain saquinavir uptake is limited by multiple efflux transporters, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein and multidrug resistance-associated protein. In situ perfusion and in vitro experiments using a classical P-gp substrate rhodamine 123 linked the effect of nicotine to inhibition of BBB P-gp transport. The effect was confirmed in vivo in chronic 14 day nicotine administration animals. These data suggest nicotine increases antiretroviral drug exposure to brain and may represent a significant in vivo drug-drug interaction at the BBB. Although this may slightly benefit CNS antiretroviral efficacy, it may also expose the brain to potential serious neurotoxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available