4.5 Article

Involvement of ERK2 in traumatic spinal cord injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages 131-142

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06579.x

Keywords

extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 2; locomotor function; RNA interference; spinal cord injury; tissue damage

Funding

  1. Paralysis Project of America
  2. Kentucky Spinal Cord
  3. Head Injury Research Trust
  4. University of Florida Seed
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [P30NS051220, P01NS058484] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) are implicated in the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the specific functions of individual ERK isoforms in neurodegeneration are largely unknown. We investigated the hypothesis that ERK2 activation may contribute to pathological and functional deficits following SCI and that ERK2 knockdown using RNA interference may provide a novel therapeutic strategy for SCI. Lentiviral ERK2 shRNA and siRNA were utilized to knockdown ERK2 expression in the spinal cord following SCI. Pre-injury intrathecal administration of ERK2 siRNA significantly reduced excitotoxic injury-induced activation of ERK2 (p < 0.001) and caspase 3 (p < 0.01) in spinal cord. Intraspinal administration of lentiviral ERK2 shRNA significantly reduced ERK2 expression in the spinal cord (p < 0.05), but did not alter ERK1 expression. Administration of the lentiviral ERK2 shRNA vector 1 week prior to severe spinal cord contusion injury resulted in a significant improvement in locomotor function (p < 0.05), total tissue sparing (p < 0.05), white matter sparing (p < 0.05), and gray matter sparing (p < 0.05) 6 weeks following severe contusive SCI. Our results suggest that ERK2 signaling is a novel target associated with the deleterious consequences of spinal injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available