4.5 Article

CASK phosphorylation by PKA regulates the protein-protein interactions of CASK and expression of the NMDAR2b gene

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages 1562-1573

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06569.x

Keywords

calcium; calmodulin-dependent serine kinase; NMDA receptor; protein kinase A phosphorylation; T-brain-1

Funding

  1. Academia Sinica
  2. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 98-2321-B-001-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine kinase (CASK), a causative gene in X-linked mental retardation, acts as a multi-domain scaffold protein and interacts with more than 20 cellular proteins in different subcellular regions of neurons. It is of interest, therefore, to explore whether post-translational modification regulates CASK's protein-protein interactions. Here, we provide evidence that CASK is phosphorylated by protein kinase A (PKA), identifying residue S562 in the PSD-95-Dlg-ZO-1 domain and residue T724 in the guanylate kinase domain as PKA sites by an in vitro PKA kinase reaction and site-directed mutagenesis. Although the role of S562 phosphorylation is not clear, T724 phosphorylation up-regulates the interaction between CASK and T-box transcription factor T-brain-1 (Tbr-1). NMDAR2b, a downstream target of the CASK-Tbr-1 complex, was then used to explore the significance of CASK phosphorylation by PKA. In cultured cortical neurons, the PKA pathway stimulates both the protein expression and the promoter activity of NMDAR2b. Deletion of the Tbr-1-binding sites greatly reduces the 3'-5'-cyclic AMP responsiveness of the NMDAR2b promoter, and the CASK T724A mutation does not promote the 3'-5'-cyclic AMP responsiveness of NMDAR2b. In conclusion, our data provide evidence that PKA phosphorylates CASK, regulates the nuclear function of CASK, and consequently modulates NMDAR2b expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available