4.5 Article

Isolation and characterization of new exon 11-associated N-terminal splice variants of the human mu opioid receptor gene

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages 962-972

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05833.x

Keywords

G protein; mu opioid receptor (MOR); morphine; mu opioid receptor-1; opioid receptor; splicing

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA13997, DA02615, DA00220, DA15446]
  2. National Cancer Institute [CA8748]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alternative splicing of the mu opioid receptor genes to create multiple mu receptor subtypes has been demonstrated in animals and humans. Previously, we identified a number of C-terminal variants in mice, rats and human, followed by several N-terminal variants associated with a new upstream exon in mice (exon 11). Behavioral studies in exon 11 knockout mice suggest an important role for the exon 11 variants in the analgesic actions of heroin and morphine-6 beta-glucuronide, but not morphine or methadone. We now have identified a homologous human exon 11 and three similar human exon 11-associated variants, suggesting conservation of exon 11 and its associated variants across species. hMOR-1i has an additional 93 amino acids at the tip of the N-terminus but is otherwise identical to hMOR-1. When expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, the additional 93 amino acids in hMOR-1i had little effect on opioid binding, but significantly altered agonist-induced G-protein activation. hMOR-1G1 and hMOR-1G2 predicted six transmembrane domain variants, similar to those seen in mice. The regional expression of these exon 11-associated variants, as determined by RT-PCR, varied markedly, implying region-specific alternative splicing. The presence of exon 11-associated variants in humans raises questions regarding their potential role in heroin and morphine-6 beta-glucuronide actions in people as they do in mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available