4.5 Article

NEAP causes down-regulation of EGFR, subsequently induces the suppression of NGF-induced differentiation in PC12 cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages 1544-1555

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05714.x

Keywords

epidermal growth factor receptor; nerve growth factor; neuroendocrine-associated phosphatase; neuronal differentiation; PC12; Wilms' tumor gene product

Funding

  1. National Health Research Institutes [MG-093-PP-07, MG-096-PP-03]
  2. National Science Council [97-2320-B-400-008-MY3]
  3. Department of Health, Taiwan [DOH95-TD-G-111-016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroendocrine-associated phosphatase (NEAP), an atypical dual specificity phosphatase is preferentially expressed in neuroendocrine cells. In this study we found that NEAP, but not NEAP-(C152S) mutant, evidently reduced epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) downstream signaling, and impaired cell growth in response to EGF stimulation in PC12 cells. These phenomena were associated with NEAP-mediated down-regulation of EGFR mRNA and protein. NEAP had no significant effect on ErbB2/3 expression and phosphorylation levels in response to heregulin, indicating that the negative effect of NEAP on EGFR was selective. We showed that NEAP suppressed EGFR expression via decreasing the EGFR promoter activity and this was mediated through down-regulations of the Akt pathway and Wilms' tumor gene product (WT1). Consistent with these results, expression of WT1 reversed the suppressive effect of NEAP on EGFR promoter activity. Additionally, NEAP knockdown by RNA interference enhanced EGFR protein expression and nerve growth factor-induced differentiation, and an EGFR-specific inhibitor could reverse the later event. Taken together, our study indicated that NEAP modulates PC12 differentiation via suppression of EGFR expression and signaling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available