4.5 Article

Effect of neoadjuvant temozolomide upon volume reduction and resection of diffuse low-grade glioma

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages 155-161

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1538-7

Keywords

Temozolomide; Low-grade glioma; Surgery; Volume reduction; Tumor response

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maximal safe resection is associated with prolonged survival in patients with low-grade glioma (LGG). It has been suggested that neoadjuvant temozolomide may provide sufficient tumor shrinkage to facilitate aggressive surgical debulking. We examined the impact of temozolomide upon volume reduction and resectability of LGG. We retrospectively identified 20 adult patients with biopsy-proven, deemed not totally resectable LGGs, treated initially with temozolomide. Volumetric 3D (calculated from serial FLAIR images) and 2D tumor measurements were obtained prior to treatment and at 3 months post-treatment. The anticipated extent of resection (EOR) at the 2 time points was measured based on anatomical limitations, calculated as: [(total tumor volume - unresectable tumor volume)/total tumor volume] x100. Eloquent cortex, deep structures and corpus callosum were considered unresectable. Mean tumor volume was 68.4 cm(3) pre-treatment and 49.5 cm(3) at 3 months post-treatment. The mean change from baseline to 3 months after treatment was -32.5 % (p < 0.001). Mean 2D pre-treatment area was 28.6 and 23.3 cm(2) at 3 months post-treatment. The 2D change was also significant, with mean change of -17 % (p < 0.001). 5 % had partial response; 40 % minor response; 45 % stable disease; and 10 % progressive disease by RANO criteria. Mean pre-treatment anticipated EOR was 67.2 and 71.5 % at 3 months post-treatment. The mean change from baseline was 4.3 % (p = 0.10). Our findings demonstrate significant volumetric and 2D reduction of LGG with temozolomide. Although this tumor shrinkage might facilitate radical surgical resection in some cases, our data failed to show statistically significant improvement in anticipated EOR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available