4.5 Article

Study of chromosome 9q gain, Notch pathway regulators and Tenascin-C in ependymomas

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 2, Pages 267-274

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1287-z

Keywords

Ependymoma; FISH; IHC; Chromosome 9q; Notch-1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ependymomas are relatively uncommon tumours of the central nervous system which arise from the ependymal lining of the ventricles and spinal canal. The molecular changes leading to ependymal oncogenesis are not completely understood. We examined chromosome 9q33-34 locus for gain, potential oncogenes at this locus (Notch-1 and Tenascin-C) and Notch pathway target genes (Hes-1, Hey-2 & C-myc) in ependymomas by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively, to assess if they have any correlation with clinical characteristics. We analyzed 50 cases of ependymomas by FISH for 9q gain and by IHC for Notch-1 and its target gene proteins (Hes-1, Hey-2 and C-myc) expression. We also performed IHC for Tenascin-C to rule out any correlation with aggressiveness/grade of tumour. FISH study revealed significant chromosome 9q gain in ependymomas of adult onset (age > 18 years) and spinal cord origin. Notch-1 showed significantly more frequent immunohistochemical expression in supratentorial and anaplastic ependymomas. Tenascin-C (TN-C) expression was significant in intracranial, childhood (age a parts per thousand currency sign 18 years) and anaplastic ependymomas. Of the three Notch pathway target gene proteins (Hes-1, Hey-2 and C-myc), Hes-1 and C-myc expression showed significant correlation with anaplastic and adult onset ependymomas, respectively. Genetic alterations are independent prognostic markers in ependymomas. A clinicopathological correlation with various molecular signatures may be helpful in the development of new therapeutic targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available