4.5 Review

Clinicoradiological features of rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor (RGNT) of the fourth ventricle: report of four cases and literature review

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 301-308

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-008-9661-y

Keywords

Rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor; RGNT; Posterior fossa tumor; Cerebral tumor hemorrhage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor (RGNT) of the fourth ventricle is a recently characterized rare tumor entity. Despite benign histological features and a reported favorable postoperative course, there is still limited clinical experience with this tumor. Methods Retrospective analysis of the clinical, radiological, and surgical data in four patients with RGNT was performed. Mean age at diagnosis was 35 years, and the median follow-up was 19 (range 2-30) months. The results were compared with the literature. Results Patient 1 presented on an emergency basis due to intratumoral hemorrhage and tumor enlargement followed by life-threatening obstructive hydrocephalus. Patient 2 suffered from headaches and left-sided hemiparesthesia 6 months prior to surgery. Patient 3 developed headaches with nausea and vomiting, followed by left-sided tinnitus 1 year prior to surgery. In patient 4, RGNT was detected incidentally. No differentiating radiological characteristics were seen except for the presence of minute satellite lesions in two patients. Histopathological findings were distinct and showed their typical biphasic neurocytic and glial architecture. No progression/recurrence was seen in the postoperative course. Conclusions The spectrum of presenting symptoms of RGNT is wide, nonspecific, and typically depends on tumor size and extent. This tumor entity should be considered in the differential diagnosis of posterior fossa masses in order to avoid undue surgical aggressiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available